Forum

Ivan, I agree with you 100% regarding applying common sense. However, in the past the NCU have tried to apply common sense, only to be threatened with legal action. Rules are needed, but surely the spirit of the game is more important, with clubs being mature enough to apply discretion when required.

re Ground Requirements - Premier League and Section I

Andy, the ground requirements can be found here:
http://www.northerncricketunion.org/database/thencu/regulations.shtml

4th link down the page

Not long back home from the friendly T20 match I mentioned earlier in the week between ourselves (Victoria C.C.) and Donacloney C.C.

This was a match organised for mainly players from both clubs who so far this season have been new signings and who have not always been able to maintain a regular place every Saturday.

A great success it turned out to be, many good new young players on both sides and played in a very competitive manor with some great cricket for the home & travelling support to saviour.

And a big thank-you to N.C.U. umpire Andy Kennedy none-other !
Who indeed attended and officiated throughout the match, not just adding a little more kudas to the occasion, but was a big help to some of the new bowlers and wasn't slow at giving a little timely advice when required.

Thanks again Andy, much appreciated hope you got home safely and thanks as well for signing a few photo's for me & the team !

has anyone any idea of the criteria that apply in respect of grounds in the various Sections of the 1st Division such as who needs covers, sightscreens, etc.?

Too many opinions without the facts on this issue gentlemen? Why doesn't the NCU chairman come back on with the reasons why their decision was made before this gets out of control? At the end of the day clubs should want to play cricket but if the rules are broken then is there a compromise? Dangerous ground after what has happened in the last few years.

I understand the need for rules and I think this is a sound enough rule but surely using common sense and thinking of the bigger picture and the spirit of the game is even more important. I add that I haven't got all the facts to hand and my view is a general one that anything that attracts bad publicity for the game just can't be good. The game is suffering from a lack of sponsors at the moment and negative publicity doesn't help.
While I can I will advocate that my club play for the points on the pitch and not in committee rooms.

Unfortunate situation with the Dundrum game! I dont know the facts so cant comment with any real authority - however, if it is the case that something went wrong at Dundrum's end then the only outcome can be the game awarded to Laurelvale. Rules are there for a reason and must be followed. While the flexibility to the 30 day rule may be a sore point for Dundrum, I doubt it was down to them "allowing" the re-arrangement to go over the cut-off period. I'm pretty sure it would have been up to the NCU given the special circumstances! I dont think this should come into the equation as Laurelvale done nothing wrong but to ask for dispensation to support a worthy cause!

re: Dundrum v Laurelvale

I have a feeling there may be more to come on this issue. Is it not the case that Dundrum allowed the match to be played outside the 30 day cut off date to allow Laurelvale to play a fund raising match and also that the match started late, both reasons for Dundrum to have claimed the points!

I think Jeff may be on soon with more than just racing tips!!

RE Laurelvale-Dundrum

Understand Ivans comment, but have to agree with Bruce.

The rule was passed and clear interpretation of it was made known

Sorry Dundrum...but you shouldn't have a leg to stand on....schoolboy error i'm afraid

No doubt the NCU will leave themselves wide open again however...!

Dundrum v Laurelvale

If the rules regarding duckworth lewis printouts have been broken by the home club, then Laurevale are quite within their rights to appeal the NCU decision.

Bear in mind that it is a fair distance to travel to Dundrum for an early midweek start. The players would have had to have taken time off work. Is it fair to ask them to do this again?

dundrum v laurelvale

can anyone explain what actually happened?

Dundrum v Laurelvale
An update: The Union has this morning received a written appeal from Laurelvale CC against their decision to ask for the match to be replayed, and are asking for the umpires decision to award the match to them to stand.

Dundrum v Laurelvale.
Pleased to see the " common sense " law has been used. I just couldn't fathom how two fine clubs would have wanted it any other way.

Re Dundrum v Laurelvale
The game was abandoned last night but the NCU have asked for the game to be replayed.

Good win for Laurelvale away to Dundrum ?

I understand the game was awarded to Laurelvale due to a computer failure. Don't know the full details but just can't fathom how it can be classed as " a good win ". Surely the game of cricket is the loser in these situations.
Any more details available ?