Forum

Please click here to leave a message.

The Ulster Cricketer reserves the right not to publish submissions written under pseudonyms or which make gratuitous personal attacks.

Davy McD VCC

Searching for logic

24th Oct 2010

One of the other things that was passed at the AGM which I was against was the reduction in overs for wuite a few second and third teams, and that even 30 over games start at noon from July on, in a mover designed to get "adults playing the game"
Quite how this will encourage anyone that works saturday mornings to play is beyond me, and a step up from 35 to 50 overs when called from the seconds to the firsts is far too large a jump.
Then how many players will not get a bat on a lot of weeks (especially if the top order are doing anyway well), and when they do get in it will just be for a slog at the end of an innings

JEFF

dundrum

24th Oct 2010

10/1 nap 14/1 5/1 & 9/4 not bad price for winners ARMAGH man will prob come on say he dint back them as 2 big prices .lol going down royal 2days nov 5 /6 th great punters pack if you book in advance 20£ gets u entry free 5£ bet glass wine an hot beef roll racecard an into marquee, on the friday then the sat is the big raceday might see if the cricketers on here fancy it as the fri imo is the best day for punting ,was good weekend punting 301£ for 3 numbers on irish lottery and had tenner@34 celtic too win halftime lose full time .

Ryan

W Hills

24th Oct 2010

Jeff when are you going to organise a night out at D'patrick to earn us all a few quid? Would be great crack.

jeff

dundrum

23rd Oct 2010

hope ARMAGH man backed my tips at wexford 10/1 nap 5 winners 1 placed 14/1 ?

Jeff

getting colder

22nd Oct 2010

ARMAGH M, My nap is Blessed Biata 340 newbury eway sat

JEFF

thers only 1 rooney .

22nd Oct 2010

ARmagh. very poor card but ill try few eway

1 steel park
2turtle boys
3 araucari has only model county lass
4 korean . reserve malande if runs danger

5 fisher bridge danger lenabane
6 rockeys choice , more clarets ran well downpatrick las sat danger
7 definite class nap danger dernier

good luck

David Edwards

Work

22nd Oct 2010

Michael. It's sad to see that you're losing your mental and perhaps physical fitness. I've seen older men than you manage to get recounts from the floor.

Jeff Maguire

roonnneeeyyyyy signs again lol

22nd Oct 2010

Will do in minute . just have too agree with micheal it was rushed thru quicker than usian bolt out the traps . Dundrum voted againest but i personally think long term it will help the premier standard but do think 4relegated is too much in one year as imo it will also lead too lot premier clubs either thru tapping up or offering fringe players the chance too join the elite .Think it was badly handled an im quite sue that some regret voting for it and i personally wish i had of went with what i was intending too do call for recount written on paper an if possible eventually logged that it could been printed out so then every club new what they voted for as fair play too neil cahill he asked as quickly as possible did the committe vote etc. ps rooney just signed 5 year contract for MAN UTD by god his agent done some bit business this week ,pps bet u he kisses the shirt in his next goal scored

ARMAGH MAN

THE MALL

22nd Oct 2010

DID YOU GET A LOOK AT THE WEXFORD CARD TOMORROW JEFF

Michael Foster

Trap 6

22nd Oct 2010

David - thanks for that marvellous advice. It would have taken me to have been out of the traps as fast as anything you might see at Drumbo to have asked for a recount before we were on to the other business, but that's life. The top table wanted a result, they got a result, so fair play to them. We could debate this all day, but time I think to move on and hear what else is making news in the local cricket world.

PS - Rodders is my wife's uncle, not my cousin, I know for someone as precise as yourself, you would like that corrected for you. I know Rodney probably would!!!

Ryan

Down

22nd Oct 2010

Peter..

Your right one size doesn't fit all (and from talking to some senior clubs who occupy lower leagues I can understand their plight / frustrations). I speak somewhat selfishly as a player wanting the quality to improve week in week out
(in my league). I understand the varied views on this forum and do indeed feel that a more flexible approach should have been taken. Debate is healthy.

taito

work

22nd Oct 2010

i have to say for once i agree with charlie, i just think there is very little for the teams in the lower leagues to play for apart from finishing in the top 6 of the league. Maybe an idea could have been for the bottom two from the premier league to be relegated and then the top two from section 1 to play off with the next two at the bottom of the prtemier league to see who makes up the last two positions in the 8 in the new top league.
The same would apply in the lower leagues and would give all the clubs a lot more to play for.
Obviously this is irrelevant now as the motion was passed so we all just have to embrace it.

andy kennedy

Buckna

22nd Oct 2010

Re Peter Whitten - I never regarded myself as being "over sensitive" but I am sure that there are plenty of forumites who would regard me as a shrinking violet! It comes from spending my formatative years at Miss Lavender's private school! I was simply making the point that for many years progress was stymied by the requirement for a large %age vote. I have in the past sat through NCU AGMs where the role of the "professional" was debated and everyone wrung their hands in debate - and then voted in a partisan manner. I, for one, am enjoying the healthy debate that has been opened but then again Flossie says I should get out more.

Charles McCrum

Lurgan

22nd Oct 2010

Paul Stafford seems to have summarised the ncu situation very well by asking where the fairness is in the new system.
I'm not saying I disagree with the eight team league scenario but it means that life in the ncu next year is all about relegation.
In a reverse of Pauls facts (and I am sure they are correct), if I were to say ok we'll have the 8 teams in the top league in 2012 but we will make them up by relegating the bottom 4 in the top division and promoting 2 out of the next section, people would say that is crazy. Maybe so but is the situation not a bit harsh on the lower league teams.

David Edwards

At home

21st Oct 2010

M Parks, I had assumed based on the location of the poster and their general agreement with your sentiments (hence the caveat in my previous posting) that P Carpenter was a member of your club. If this assumption offends you then I can only apologise but in truth there is little difference between your opinions; it's a question of degree.
Mr (I presume but correct me if I'm wrong) Carpenter you are wrong to regard me as taking a condescending attitude and indeed that I am an elected official of the NCU. Do feel free to explain to me in which way I am being condescending; emotive possibly but not condescending. If you were at the meeting then you will be aware that the NCU is not a body independent of the clubs but rather is one that is elected by and is therefore fully representative of its clubs. You will also be aware that Murray Power stated that there were positions available on various of the Directorates so I shall make the same proposal to you that I have on another Irish cricket forum and ask you to volunteer your time. You're closer to the meetings than I am and I'd like to have more time to persue other interests. It's a bit harder than you think and perhaps I should point out that the only person to take up the offer resigned before the start of the next season.
In answer to Mr Carpenter's concerns that below the Premier league that their fixtures would be dramatically reduced if they had a poor cup run there is little that anyone can do about that and 3rd teams have been living with that for many years. It is the nature of a knockout competition that some will play more games than others and those not knocked out may well find themselves playing too many games. If you look at the number of unfulfilled fixtures which have happened even by 1stXI's then I would suggest that there is a problem with too many fixtures that needs to be addressed. As in all democratic decisions there are winners and losers so perhaps you could put forward a more reasonable proposal for consideration.
Fozzy, perhaps you are a little less observant than I and your cousin because we suspected that the motion had been lost and was pleasantly surprised to find otherwise. If there was any shred of doubt in your mind then you should have requested a recount straight away. A recount may well have been called for had the result gone the other way but this is only because somebody had realised it was close and would have requested it. It is not an unknown request at NCU AGM's and is facilitated. Go with your gut instinct next time and don't let the hare sit!