Forum

Please click here to leave a message.

The Ulster Cricketer reserves the right not to publish submissions written under pseudonyms or which make gratuitous personal attacks.

Ivan McCombe

Home

21st Dec 2015

Pete's team using the criteria he outlined doesn't look far off the mark. Greg Thompson would be another name in the mix, Trevor Brittan turns out good figures most weeks and could be preferred to Mulder. Strong pace attack with four internationals.,

Roger Bell

Carrickfergus

21st Dec 2015

Re: Pete's team

A good side, but Jamie Holmes should surely be in there to strengthen the batting order, as of the Irish qualified batsmen, only James Hall and James Shannon finished ahead of him in the 2015 NCU Premier League averages. He is also one of the best fielders in the league, and a handy leg-spinner.

It must now be time for the Knights to give him another go, as they have not selected him since the T20 Inter pros in 2013 when he gave a reasonable account of himself. He is now based in the Province and has been steadily improving as a player since then.

Hopefully he will finally be given a chance to prove himself in 2016. Jamie is only 23 and still has ambitions to play for Ireland, and he has shown a genuine committment to NCU and Irish cricket by playing here since 2011.

Clarence Hiles

Headquarters

20th Dec 2015

Very good side Pete. Might be a useful exercise if we could troll readers to find out if this would be the team of their choice.

Richard

Derry

20th Dec 2015

Re:Wylie
Is it not a case that Johnny Thompson has never been considered for selection for Knights and therefore never asked

Pete

Portadown

19th Dec 2015

With all this talk about interpros would this be the strongest team in all forms (excluding pros, retired internationals and assuming everyone would make themselves available)

1. James Hall
2. Chris Dougherty (WK)
3. Ryan Haire
4. James Shannon
5. Lee Nelson
6. Max Sorensen
7. Jonny Thompson
8. Graeme McCarter
9. Gary Kidd
10. Jacob Mulder
11. Phil Eaglestone

Ivan McCombe

Getting ready to host a sober evening with the NCU chairman - age does strange things

18th Dec 2015

Cheers Clarence. Always great to debate cricket with you. Nowadays it takes a lot less pints to make me loud and irrational . Lol

Clarence Hiles

Headquarters

18th Dec 2015

Ivan,
Agreed on NCU geographical boundaries. In practical terms anything 'artificial' could neither be defended in law or policed in practice. (Although they said that about the border when it was established in 1921). LOL. You have identified one method, namely where the player plays, and that's the current ruling. This is an interprovincial and not an international, so it works in practical terms, but not to the satisfaction of everyone. The North-West are unhappy because their best players are being pillaged by a rival, some of these players are unhappy because they can't play for their province and many NCU clubs are unhappy because their emerging young players won't get opportunities at the higher level. I can't speak for hard-working NCU youth coaches but I would guess they share this view. Some of the best NCU players are not enthused by the Interpros. If so many people are unhappy with the current set-up how can it be right?
We need to get back to managing and promoting cricket from the bottom up and not from the top down. At club level we need to develop a stronger base to secure a better future and there are signs within the NCU that union and visionary clubs have embraced this philosophy. However, I'm not sure CI has bought into it. The current Interpro tournament doesn't work other than providing a showpiece requirement for attaining test status. It has to be there, but currently it has too many flaws and in my opinion, doesn't serve club or interprovincial interests. This is a big topic, but compare Leinster to NCU and North-West and ask yourself is it a level playing field?
PS
My pint these days is water so the debate won't deteriorate the way it did in the old days! LOL

Ivan McCombe

Counting the spectators in the NZ v SL Test match

18th Dec 2015

Clarence
Probably be more fun discussing this over a pint but surely the ultimate objective of the interpros is to identify players who are potential internationals regardless of age.
Will we only find out how good the likes of Gary McClintock is by having him face Max Sorenson and Graeme McCarter rather than lesser bowlers .
I don't accept that if they are good enough they will get selected is a throwaway line. As you move up the standards very few teams want to "carry a player " just because he's young .
Talk about picking players from other unions . Surely a player is only registered with one Union as a player and while he's with a club in that union then - that's his union. To penalise player movement by not selecting them for the inter pro's could surely be construed as an obstacle preventing a player from earning a living. I'm sure that's why the NCU have what seems a strange rule where a NW player is considered " in the NCU area ". I'm sure that's to stop any restraint of trade challenges under N I law.

Clarence Hiles

Headquarters

17th Dec 2015

Ivan,
I don't think it is about ticking boxes, it is about identifying the objectives and then setting a strategy in place to achieve them. We don't know the NCU strategy, but it seems somewhere in between trying to field a competitive team and bringing through emerging talent. If this is the case they are falling between two stools and getting criticized from both sectors. Better to have one objective and stick to it. And I don't buy that throwaway comment "if they are good enough they'll come through." It has no substance. Emerging young players need opportunities and nurturing to establish them at higher levels, not just in cricket but throughout team sports. The best results come from this approach. This doesn't close the door on older players either, because you can't ignore the form book. If the NCU pick the players from other unions then they are not only depriving our emerging players, but draining the other unions of their best players. This doesn't help the Interpro' tournament.

terry

the lough of carn

17th Dec 2015

if you where to judge the northern knights games on spectator numbers its not really a runaway success i think you would find the money paid to the players is a divisise issue and is already ruining the premier league as a fair competition players who want to play for ireland usually get picked after county championship experience and that is not going to change in the near future so why not use these games as a showcase of young emerging cricketers who i suspect would gladly play for free but since they already get paid at their clubs a dangerous precedent has been set one which i think their is no going back

Ivan McCombe

Away to look for an Australian brickie

17th Dec 2015

Clarence I'm not sure how picking your best team excludes the good young players. If they are good enough they will get picked. If CI have only a ticks a box interest as I think you are suggesting then we will get ticks a box selection, ticks a box interest from spectators.

Clarence Hiles

Headquarters

17th Dec 2015

Ivan,
Looking from the outside we don't really know what selection policy the NCU selectors have in place, but we do know they have an inherent loyalty to the development of NCU cricket. The issue might be-'do we throw all our assets into winning the Interpro' competitions or do we continue with developing our young players and bringing them through?' Other considerations are 'can we accommodate Ireland-qualified players and if players from other unions playing in the NCU don't want to play then they should be allowed to play in the union of their choice. It is not simply a case of playing the strongest team as the NCU selectors are in an impossible situation as they won't please everyone. For example, you appear to want to do this, but I disagree because it demotivates and removes opportunities for young players that we have invested heavily in over the past decade. Also the NCU 'boundary' makes plundering North-West players easy and is absurd and unfair to our cricket neighbours. I suspect CI sees this as a provincial matter and not that high up in their priorities as long as the competition takes place.

Clarence Hiles

Headquarters

17th Dec 2015

Come on guys the photo competition can't be that difficult for all you cricket buffs. Let's have a few more entries and don't be afraid if you don't have all the answers as it will a great achievement if someone has the complete set.

C Boomer

Nice weather for ducks

17th Dec 2015

Re Poem : Farmer Fred

The 3rd line of the 8th stanza should read ' Awdry's portly controller '

And in case any are unfamiliar, the Reverend Wilbert Awdry was the creator of children's stories about Thomas the Tank engine, which featured amongst many imaginative characters, 'the fat controller.'

Ivan McCombe

Admiring Michael Kennedy's work on the ground at Moylena

16th Dec 2015

Wylie
No I haven't but it's a sad reflection on interpros that people like Johnny Thompson, James Hall and Gary Kidd don't get motivated to play regularly. The best opening bowler , best opening bat and best slow bowler in the NCU.
Is it a question of compensation for loss of earnings?
I seemingly wrongly associated the Inter Pro's as a stepping stone between club cricket and the Ireland senior team and on that basis would have expected it to feature the best players available.
It seems it's now more of a competition aimed at finding out which Union is the strongest but is that based on players currently playing in a Union or players brought through a Union's under age system.
A lot of emphasis seems to be put on young players. I see Tyrone Kane mentioned as a replacement for John Mooney. Is he a better all round cricketer than Johnny Thonpson ?
Adam Voghts made his Australia debut at 34 years of age and he hasn't done too bad recently .